Farkel, where did you get the statistics in your opening post from? Was that the complete list of questions included in the survey, or were the questions the students did well on left off your final list?
I find it very interesting that you won't say where your source came from. Did you make up those statistics?
I have several friends who are professors, both of whom have taught at major universities, including Princeton, UCLA, and UC Berkely. They were the ones who told me this from their first hand experience. Yes, it is anecdotal, but they had no axe to grind, because they were educators, too.
I'm going to have to call bullsh*t on that claim as well. I can make up friends too. Let's just say that my imaginary friends that teach at prestigious universities say the exact opposite of your imaginary friends. Where does that leave us now? Oh yeah, looking for real facts or evidence.
Do you have any actual evidence that educators are, using your vague term, "bottom of the barrel"? SAT scores, IQ tests?
Besides, if educators are better than I suggested and as good as you implied, why, in all of my schooling (when I good a GOOD primary education) can I only recall 3 of them as memorable and discard the rest of them as terrible or at best, mediocre)? What is YOUR experience growing up? Everyone I have spoken to about this subject has an experience similar to mine.
First off, I never implied educators were any more intelligent than the average person. Go back and read what I wrote. Just because I'm challenging you to produce real evidence to support your thesis doesn't mean I therefore must believe the opposite of what you're postulating. And are you seriously asking me to give you anecdotes from my life ? Ha-Ha
Anybody else see the sad irony in someone that's seemingly unclear on the important distinction between anecdotes and actual scientific evidence, starting a thread denigrating the intellectual capabilities of an entire segment of the population? Tell me I'm not the only one that finds that amusing.